Search Houghton Regis Notes

Monday 11 February 2013

HRN1 Comments: More Needs Doing to Decrease Car Dependency

Last night, the Town Council Planning and Licensing Committee reviewed the preliminary plans for HRN1, the major housing development site north of Houghton Regis expected to include over 5,000 homes. In my remarks, I focused on reducing car dependency in this new community.

While the current plans reference walking and cycling routes, more can be done to minimize car use. I suggested the developers explore options like a carpool system, especially for higher-density areas, and a shuttle bus to connect residents to Leagrave train station. Similar programs have worked well elsewhere. Offerings like these could make HRN1 more appealing to buyers who value sustainability.

Thinking more broadly about transportation planning for Central Bedfordshire, I also proposed a park-and-ride facility near the future M1 Junction 11a. This could encourage locals and visitors alike to use coaches and public transit rather than contributing to traffic congestion in the Luton-Dunstable-Houghton Regis area.

Additionally, I asked that alternative routes be built around shopping areas. This way, necessary road works won’t force major detours.

My colleagues raised valid points about the lack of land allocated for a cemetery or places of worship. The cash generating schemes like a car showroom and a supermarket had been specifically mentioned at this early stage. Isn't it telling that a loss-making community facility like a chapel or a cemetery, is too far down the developers thinking to be included at this stage?

While other councillors offered insightful feedback as well, it would be inappropriate for me to attribute specific comments to them here, as per council rules. The full remarks will be published pending approval.


To make a comment, support or object: http://www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk/PLANTECH/DCWebPages/acolnetcgi.gov?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeResultDetail&TheSystemkey=579904

At the foot of the page, click "Submit a Public Online Comment", and then click If you do not have a reference number click here"

Sunday 10 February 2013

Zebra Crossings: A Passion for Central Refuges

This week I had correspondence with the Highway Authority for Bedfordshire,  and with Central Bedfordshire Council Development Control officials. Copying in various CBC councillors. I was concerned about the impending works due to start tomorrow in Houghton Regis High Street.





When complete, the scheme, a Section 278 agreement, for road works in conjunction with Morrison's new large supermarket, will provide 8 new zebra crossings, where previously there had been just 3 pelican crossings. Part of the scheme is illustrated here.



Looking back to the record of the Planning and Licensing committee of the Town Council in October 2010, I can see that we recorded concern at the proximity of some of the 'pelican' crossings to roundabouts. Where 'pelican' came from, I'm not sure, because the scheme shows zebra's. For myself, I do recall commenting that they were zebra crossings.



At the time we probably concentrated a lot more on the plethora of paperwork to do with the store, the car park, and the access points. Nevertheless, the point was made about crossings being too close to roundabouts.  But, I think, whatever sort of crossing, there was an unquestioned belief that central refuge's would also be provided with these crossings. After all, as with the present pelican crossing below, we already had a refuge. Why would this new scheme offer less protection to pedestrians?






Pelican crossing with central refuge is due to be replaced with a zebra and no refuge.

The Bedford Road, Houghton Regis, was converted to a zebra late last year. The old central refuge was removed, the zebra installed a bit further back from the roundabout than previous position, but without a central refuge. There was an instant outcry from the public saying it was too close to the roundabout for such a long crossing. Newspapers have twice reported knock-downs of pedestrians since then, in Bedford Road.







CBC's Development Control apparently asked for the crossing to be moved even further back from the roundabout "before Christmas". But nothing appeared to happen. The revised plan I was privy to seemed to call for the zebra to be removed back down the road about 3/4 the width of the crossing. Maybe it was or is being moved. But I don't think people will spot that it's been moved. So we're still likely to have an outcry. 










The width of this road in Houghton Regis is due to get a zebra crossing without a central refuge.


Somewhere near the keep left sign above, a crossing is due to be installed, without a central refuge. I am very concerned that when traffic comes off this roundabout that they will not have a clear view of a pedestrian standing over on the right-hand side of the road. Traffic will emerge from Bedford Road (on the right of this picture above) and will not necessarily have a good sight line to pedestrians. In the picture below, looking from the other direction, you could try to make your own estimation of sight, on perhaps a dull, wet day with rain lashing at the windscreen.




This is a view of the same crossing from the other direction. As you can see from above, maybe there should not be two crossings so close together, but that is a secondary issue to the one of providing a pedestrian refuge. 





Can I tell you, dear reader, I'm currently being advised by Highways that in Houghton Regis the road is not too wide, and therefore people do not need a refuge. So why am I so passionately in favour of refuges? 





Here's why. When I lived in Hemel Hempstead for over 30 years, the local zebra crossing in Queensway close to a roundabout, had a refuge and still has. A fairly narrow road, taking a significant amount of traffic, but IT HAS A REFUGE that 



  • gives pedestrians a safety zone if someone coming off the roundabout misses them, 

  • gives pedestrians confidence to cross.

  • helps to reduce the chance of accidents.








Closer to home there are dozens of examples where central refuges are provided. Here's one in West Street Dunstable:









So, why can't we have central refuges, too, in Houghton Regis?




  




Sunday 3 February 2013

Liberal Democrat Leaflet: Promises made, Promises kept | Action on Rat Run




Promises made, Promises kept | Action on Rat Run | Please for Winter Grit | High Street Works



Another Unpaid Week in Politics


I've had a number of meetings this week.

On Monday evening I took part in the full Houghton Regis Town Council Meeting. We heard that we had not got all the information we needed to set a budget for the town council yet, for April 2013 to March 2014. In the past the number of households on which to base Council Tax has included all those who did not pay council tax, but were in receipt of benefits. The government then guaranteed the collecting council, in our case Central Bedfordshire, the money. Now, the government is saying that the collecting council cannot include those households on benefits. Therefore, there is a shortfall of household numbers over which to spread the same total costs. In common with other councils, Central Bedfordshire have had to come up with their own scheme to decide how they will charge those households on benefits. In turn, for the coming year, CBC have calculated a bonus that Houghton Regis Town Council will get from its share of the money they hope to collect from those households on benefits, some of whom will be paying Council Tax for the first time (or not, if they decide putting food on the table is more important!) - The resulting gap on the Town Council's financing  is that we'll have to put up our share of the Council Tax just to keep on with what we are paying for now. Then add inflationary costs, and it bumps up again. The next dilemma, is that there is no guarantee from CBC that they will give us this "bonus" next year, which could leave us with a gaping £90,000 hole in the budget for next year. Tomorrow night, we have to meet again to decide what our Town Council's share of the whole Council Tax pot will be.

On Tuesday I attended the Houghton Regis Memorial Hall's steering committee. The Hall was built out of fundraising in the fifties by people who wanted to leave a lasting legacy to the local people who died in World Wars. The Hall's funds are in a healthy state. We heard about the need for maintenance items like water pipes needing attention, flaking brickwork in parts, and discussed ways to keep cars off a pathway at the rear of the building. New fire doors are to be ordered up to replace a rotting framework and doors in poor condition. The insistence of the Performing Rights people that the Hall needs to pay for a licence to put music on rumbles on. The committee doesn't see why the Hall should pay for a licence as they don't play any music. People who book the hall pay for their own licences if they want music; why do Performing Rights insist on a douple dip?  We meet again in 2 months time.

On Wednesday afternoon I had a two hour meeting with Nick Shaw from Central Bedfordshire Council's Travel Choices team. He gave me an overview of their remit and explained how some of the £4.9m is to be spent around Leighton Buzzard, Dunstable, and Houghton Regis. In return I gave him a list of things on my mind to do with Houghton Regis.The team have already done some work on Dog Kennel path and other parts of this route that form a part of a national cycle route. There is some potential news ahead in the form of a community bus. A wheels-to-work scheme is being run by Beds RCC - an example given was that someone was assisted back into the workplace by being provided with a scooter to get to Aylesbury for 6am. If anyone has ideas for improving routes to work, or otherwise improving walking and cycling routes, and provided the route is one that "Highways" would be responsible for, then Travel Choices might be able to help. Or drop me a note.

On Wednesday evening I had another meeting at the Town Council's offices. This time in private to meet with my colleagues to discuss our ideas on the Houghton Regis precept for the Council Tax. Debate and consensus reached.



On Friday I was amazed to see the roof was off a land-mark building in Houghton Regis town centre and wrote up this story. Some of my Facebook friends nearly had kittens when they read it. I understand from ward councillors, Susan Goodchild and David Jones that they have alerted the planning enforcement officers.




On Saturday morning I attended a 3 hour meeting of the Bedfordshire Fire and Rescue Service public forum in Brewers Hill Road, Dunstable. An insightful and well run meeting in which the options facing BFRS for their share of Council Tax were explained and considered. The government would permit a 1% increase in BFRS share of Council Tax, AND GIVE IT TO THEM FOR NO INCREASE TO THE COUNCIL TAX PAYER. Except the catch is, that if inflation runs at 3%, then by the end of the year their overhead costs will have increased, and they will then need to collect even more the following year to catch up. Perhaps it is better to collect 2% and pass that 2% increase to the tax payer. That way asking for another increase the next year will not need to be such a big jump. That was certainly what the majority of the public forum thought. 

FIRE QUIZ
Have a go at these questions and write a quick answer down. Then check this link for the answer. 
1. How many people per year die in fires in Bedfordshire ?
2. How much does it cost in labour to crew one fire engine for a year ?
3. What is the annual budget of BFRS ?
4. How much does BFRS cost a Band D property ?



And Finally ...


It was brass monkey weather down at "Great Crixsey Cow Common", the home of Dunstablians RFU, on Saturday afternoon. At least 3 degrees cooler than up in the town. At least the locals won!